All Posts
Webflow
15
min read
Published on
October 21, 2026

Yannik Moll
CEO

Table Of Contents
If you work at a software company in Germany, Austria or Switzerland, there's a good chance your website runs on TYPO3. Outside the DACH region it's less well known, but there it's one of the most widely used content management systems: open source, built in PHP, around since the late 1990s and powerful enough to run large, multilingual corporate websites.
Many B2B SaaS companies set up their TYPO3 site five or ten years ago, when it was the obvious choice for a professional web presence. Since then, the job of the website has changed. Marketing wants to ship campaign landing pages the same day, launch feature pages with every product release and test new positioning. In TYPO3, every one of those changes ends up as a ticket in the dev backlog.
The moment most teams start questioning the setup is the next major upgrade. This guide helps you make that call and walks you through a CMS migration from TYPO3 to Webflow that protects your rankings and your pipeline. It's based on relaunches for more than 120 software companies, including TYPO3 migrations with several hundred pages. The general relaunch process is covered in our website relaunch guide for SaaS. This article focuses on what's different with TYPO3.
Key takeaways
TYPO3 follows a fixed release cycle: roughly every 18 months, a new long-term support (LTS) version comes out and receives free updates for about three years. After that, TYPO3 GmbH offers paid Extended Long Term Support (ELTS). In practice, that means a decision every few years that ties up budget and dev capacity.
| Version | Status (as of October 2026) | What it means for you |
|---|---|---|
| TYPO3 v11 and older | ELTS only Free support ended | You're already paying for security or running without updates. Act now |
| TYPO3 v12 | ELTS only Free support ended on 30 April 2026 | Upgrade, ELTS or migration needs a decision now |
| TYPO3 v13 | Until Dec 2027 Security updates until end of December 2027 | About a year of runway. A good time to plan a migration properly |
| TYPO3 v14 | Until Jun 2029 Current LTS since April 2026 | No time pressure. Migrate only if TYPO3 is slowing down your marketing |
Your three options:
Our rule of thumb: if a major upgrade is coming anyway, get a quote for both paths and compare total cost of ownership over three years, not just project cost. The section on cost and timeline below shows how.
Moving from TYPO3 to Webflow is always at least a platform migration. The real question is what else you change, because that determines risk, effort and cost:
| Relaunch type | What changes | SEO risk |
|---|---|---|
| Platform migration | Only the CMS. Design, content and URLs stay | Low Often an uplift from better tech |
| Design relaunch | CMS and design. Content stays 1:1 | Low As long as templates don't lose content |
| Full relaunch | CMS, design, content and page structure | Medium to high Depends on how controlled your approach is |
| Domain change | The domain as well | Very high Belongs in the hands of an SEO agency |
Many SaaS teams want to use the migration to redo everything at once: new design, new copy, new positioning. That's understandable, but risky. When everything changes at the same time, you can't tell afterwards what caused a drop in rankings or conversions. That's why we usually recommend migrating well-ranking pages 1:1 first and optimizing after launch. What each of the four types means in detail, and how to pick the right one, is covered in our website relaunch guide for SaaS.
Webflow isn't a better TYPO3. It's a different tool for a different job: a marketing website your marketing team can develop on its own. Before you think about the process, check honestly whether your setup fits.
Most SaaS companies run three web properties with very different requirements:
In many TYPO3 installations, this separation never happened. Customer areas, downloads for existing customers and documentation live inside the marketing website. A migration is the right moment to untangle them.
This isn't a technical detail. It decides how fast your marketing can move and how safely your product runs:
None of these is automatically a dealbreaker. Many can be solved with integrations, and Webflow Enterprise adds roles, publishing workflows and higher limits. Often, though, a hybrid approach works better: the marketing website moves to Webflow, while the customer portal or docs get their own tool on a subdomain. Marketing gets its speed back without forcing product functionality into a website tool.
TYPO3 and Webflow think about websites differently. In TYPO3, editors assemble pages from content elements in a page tree, and a lot happens in the background through TypoScript, TYPO3's own configuration language. In Webflow, a designer builds a component system, and marketing combines those components into new landing pages and feature pages. This table translates your TYPO3 setup into Webflow terms:
| In TYPO3 | In Webflow | What to know |
|---|---|---|
| Page tree | Pages and folders | Similar structure, but you define new URLs in your page structure |
| Content elements (text, image, accordion …) | Components with props and slots | Marketing builds pages from approved components instead of free elements |
| Backend layouts and grid elements | Page templates and layout components | Fewer free grids, more consistent design across all pages |
| TypoScript | Webflow Designer, CMS filters, conditional visibility | No equivalent, the logic gets rebuilt |
| News extension and other records | CMS collections (blog, case studies, changelog …) | Structured content imports well via CSV or API |
| Form extensions | Webflow forms or forms from your CRM | Send demo requests and sign-ups straight to the CRM, not just the Webflow inbox |
| Search (indexed_search, Solr) | Integrations such as Finsweet or Algolia | Docs and help center usually get their own tool instead of site search |
| Backend user groups | Workspace roles | Webflow uses roles rather than page-level permissions, Enterprise adds more granularity |
| fileadmin (file storage) | Webflow assets or your marketing automation tool | Whitepapers and datasheets work best as tracked gated content |
| Languages via site configuration | Webflow Localization with subfolders | Translation fallbacks behave differently, see pitfalls below |
| Own hosting, caching, updates | Hosting, CDN and SSL by Webflow | Server maintenance and security patches go away |
The key point of this table: you don't port TYPO3, you rebuild your website on a new foundation. The content moves, the tech behind it doesn't. That's more work than a data export, but also a chance to get rid of unused extensions and pages that never matched the rest of the design. See how we set up projects like these as a Webflow Enterprise Partner.
Whether a TYPO3 migration takes six weeks or four months rarely depends on page count. It depends on how your content is built and what runs in the background. Answer these five questions before you lock the scope:
Then the most important step: test the export with three to five real pages before you estimate the total effort. Pick the most complex pages, not the simplest. Whatever breaks there will break a hundred times later.
The basic process is the same as any CMS migration. With TYPO3, each step comes with its own specifics.
Export Search Console data, conversions per page (demo requests, trial sign-ups, downloads), backlinks and a full crawl of the old site. TYPO3 adds one thing that often gets missed: redirects usually live in several places at once. In the redirects module of the backend, in the .htaccess file on the server and, on older installations, in configurations of earlier URL extensions. Collect all of them, or links that worked for years will lead nowhere after launch.
Assign every page to one of three types: a static page in Webflow (homepage, pricing, about), an item in a CMS collection (blog, case studies, use cases, glossary, changelog) or a deliberate removal. This is where you decide which content built as individual pages today will live in collections going forward. It's extra work during the migration, but it pays off with every page marketing launches on its own later.
List every page with its new URL, title and index status in one sheet, and have the owner approve it before redirect mapping starts. With TYPO3, a typical question comes up here: do you keep the existing URL structure, or clean it up, for example by dropping .html suffixes or flattening deep paths? Every changed URL needs a redirect. You can use our page structure sheet as a template.
In Webflow, you build a component system instead of individual pages: hero sections, feature blocks, social proof, comparison tables, CTA sections. The TYPO3-specific catch: capture every content element that actually appears on your existing pages, not just the ones on a single example page. Accordions, tabs, tables, embedded videos, download boxes. Whatever is missing from the template only shows up during migration, and then it costs twice.
Export structured records such as news via database export or API as CSV and import them into the matching collection. Individual pages don't export that easily: they get crawled, restructured with AI support and reviewed by people. AI is a big help with restructuring and translation, but every change to the content itself needs a human check. Move well-ranking pages over 1:1 and optimize them after launch.
Build the complete redirect map, including the old TYPO3 redirects and the URL patterns in the next section. In Webflow, upload the full list as a CSV, because an import replaces all existing entries. Before go-live, test every demo request and every trial sign-up all the way into the CRM and the product. Then monitor for at least twelve weeks. What matters from an SEO perspective is covered in our guide to a website relaunch without losing SEO. Every step with owners and timing is in the website relaunch checklist.
TYPO3 sites often carry URLs from several generations: old links from before readable URLs, .html suffixes from earlier configurations, language parameters. Google still knows many of them, and other sites still link to them. Look for these patterns in your crawl and backlink data:
| Pattern | Example | How to redirect |
|---|---|---|
| .html suffix | /product/features.html | To the new URL without suffix. Use a pattern rule instead of single entries for many pages |
| Old page IDs | /index.php?id=123 | Map each ID to a new page. Webflow redirects work on paths and can't reliably catch query parameters, so plan a rule at DNS or edge level, for example through Cloudflare |
| Language parameters | /page?L=1 or /index.php?id=123&L=1 | To the matching language version in its subfolder, such as /de/page. Same approach as for parameters above |
| News detail pages | /news/detail/news/article-title/ | To /blog/article-title. If slugs stay the same, one pattern rule covers the whole folder |
| Files in fileadmin | /fileadmin/user_upload/whitepaper.pdf | To the file's new location. Externally linked files come first |
| Trailing slash and case | /Solutions/ and /solutions | Send every variant that shows up in crawl or backlink data to exactly one destination |
| Existing TYPO3 redirects | Entries in the redirects module or .htaccess | Update them to the new final destination to avoid redirect chains |
Not every variant needs its own redirect. Priority goes to URLs with traffic, rankings or backlinks, and to anything linked from paid campaigns, sales decks, newsletters or partner sites. For the rest, pattern rules for whole folders are enough, and pages without a real replacement return a 404 or 410 instead of redirecting to the homepage.
The range depends almost entirely on what you change besides the platform. For B2B SaaS websites, these are the figures we see in our projects:
| Scope | Cost (guideline) | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Technical migration, design and content stay | from approx. €20,000–25,000 | 6–10 weeks |
| Migration with new design | from approx. €30,000 | approx. 3 months |
| Full relaunch incl. new content | approx. €40,000–60,000, enterprise up to €100,000 and more | 3–6 months |
With TYPO3, four factors drive effort up: many individually built pages instead of structured records, extensions whose functions need replacing, multiple languages and a large number of files in fileadmin.
Don't just compare project cost. Compare total cost of ownership over three years. On the TYPO3 side, that includes:
On the Webflow side, you have the migration, license costs for site and workspace plans and the optimizations you'll ship yourself or with a retainer. The line item most often missing from these comparisons is the last one on the TYPO3 side: all the small tickets for copy changes, new landing pages, feature pages for releases and campaigns. Pull the invoices from the past twelve months. Then add the opportunity cost of every campaign that went live a week later than planned.
On timeline: the biggest time factor in TYPO3 migrations is rarely the tech. It's moving individually built pages and aligning content inside your team. The earlier you run the migration check, the more accurate your plan.
We see these mistakes in TYPO3 migrations again and again. Almost all of them can be avoided with proper planning.
Behind all of this is the same principle as in every relaunch: foundation first, migrate the foundation, then optimize. Our website relaunch guide explains it in detail.
The most important points at a glance. The full working version with timing, owners and a done-criterion for every item is in our website relaunch checklist with 100+ items, also available as a Google Sheet.
Before the project
During the migration
Before and after go-live
TYPO3 is an open-source content management system written in PHP, first released in the late 1990s. It's especially common in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, among mid-sized companies, universities, public institutions and many established software companies.
ELTS stands for Extended Long Term Support. Once the free support period of a TYPO3 version ends, TYPO3 GmbH offers paid security and bug fix updates for several more years. It buys time for an upgrade or migration, but doesn't replace either.
A technical migration where design and content stay the same takes 6 to 10 weeks. With a new design, plan around 3 months, and a full relaunch with new content takes 3 to 6 months. The number of individually built pages has the biggest impact on timeline.
From around €20,000 to €25,000 for a technical migration, from around €30,000 with a new design and €40,000 to €60,000 for a full relaunch. Compare that with the cost of the next TYPO3 upgrade and your running costs over three years.
If your team works well with TYPO3 and relies on features like login areas or deeply integrated data, yes. If your site is first and foremost a marketing website and every new landing page goes through developers, migrating is usually the better investment.
Not if the migration is planned properly. What matters is a complete redirect map including old TYPO3 URLs, equivalent content on well-ranking pages and monitoring for at least twelve weeks. With a pure platform migration, we often even see an uplift thanks to the better technical foundation.
Structured records such as news can be imported via CSV or API. Individually built pages need to be restructured. AI speeds this up considerably, but the result needs a human review.
They don't move with you. Every business-critical function gets a solution in Webflow itself, an integration or a deliberate decision to drop it. In our experience, many extensions aren't needed anymore.
They don't belong on the marketing website. The app stays part of your product, help center and docs get a dedicated tool on their own subdomain. Webflow takes over the marketing website, and the handoffs, meaning sign-up and login buttons, UTM parameters and cross-domain tracking, are rebuilt and tested deliberately.
Yes, with a hybrid approach: the marketing website moves to Webflow, while a customer portal or docs stay in the existing system on a subdomain for now. Running pages from TYPO3 and Webflow side by side under the same domain, on the other hand, is complex and only makes sense in exceptional cases.
Yes, if the site is built as a component system. Then marketing launches new landing pages, feature pages and use cases from approved components without breaking the design. A short onboarding is usually enough.
Thinking about moving from TYPO3 to Webflow? See how we approach a website relaunch for B2B SaaS, or book a free strategy call and we'll run the migration check for your website together.